Tár is a meticulously crafted film, boasts a towering performance from Cate Blanchett, and tackles a serious subject in a carefully considered and measured way. So why does it leave the viewer quietly deflated?
Todd Field made his directorial debut in 2001 with In the Bedroom, and followed that up with his adaptation of Tom Perrotta’s Little Children, in 2006, both of which are superb.
All his films are clearly a conscious riposte and antidote to a culture that seems to have traded seriousness and depth for ephemeral trivia and empty if immediate gratification. And in each film, the lives of comfortable but sympathetic middle class protagonists are suddenly uprooted by external threats they’re incapable of comprehending.
Lydia Tár, played by Blanchett, is that rare thing, a respected and successful conductor in the world of classical music, who happens to be gay. Though happily ensconced with her partner and their 7 year old daughter, she clearly is or was romantically engaged with her assistant, Francesca, and had earlier had some sort of a tryst and or relationship with a musical protégée called Krista.
Enter Olga, the newly arrived and much younger cellist in the orchestra, who Blanchett instantly develops a crush on. Indeed, the only reason Olga secures her position is precisely because of said infatuation.
But when, and without giving anything away, it’s discovered that Krista has committed suicide and has somehow implicated Blanchett, her comfortable existence begins to unravel.
The problem is, the film spends far too much time establishing its classical music credentials, and not nearly enough exploring the dramatic questions it raises. What exactly is Blanchett accused of doing, what does she think she did, what actually happened, and how big is the gap between the public perception of what she’s accused of and what she actually did?
If the film had failed to fully address any of its dramatic questions, and had insisted instead on remaining steadfastly enigmatic over the course of, say, a 90 minute film, then that might have been one thing. But Tár goes on for the guts of 2 and ¾ hours.
And what you get instead are extended discussions of Mahler’s 5th, and the mildly contentious question around the tempo of its adagietto, and reams and reams of her jogging, rehearsing and composing. The opening scene in particular, in which she’s interviewed by the New Yorker’s Adam Gopnik, goes on for ev er.
You’d love to have sent them away for a month with their script and a rigorous script editor. Or alternatively, to have been left alone with the finished film and a pair of scissors in an editing suite.
When it does focus on the drama, as for instance with the scenes between Blanchett and Olga, or between Blanchett and her wife and daughter, the film sizzles and sparks fly. It just fails entirely to produce any kind of satisfying third act.
Tár is impeccably made and impressively serious, and it’s comfortably one of the best films to come out of Hollywood in years. But, disappointingly, that’s all it is. When it could and should have been so much more substantial.
You can see the trailer for Tár here:
Sign up for a subscription right or below, and I shall keep you posted every month, on All the best and worst in film, television and music!
Speak Your Mind